Technical SEO Audit Tool
Paste a live URL and get a fix-first audit: status, indexability, canonical, meta robots, robots.txt, sitemap and social tags, all read server-side.
This technical SEO audit tool runs the quick gut-check I want right after I publish or change something, the first pass before Search Console ever sees it. Paste a live URL and it fetches the page server-side, finds the robots.txt, reads the sitemap, and checks the title, the meta description, the canonical, the robots directives, the H1 structure and the Open Graph and Twitter tags. Then it scores what it found and hands you a short, prioritized list of what to fix first, because a stray noindex or a busted canonical from staging quietly pulls a page out of search no matter how good the writing is. It is one URL at a time, deliberately, so point a crawler at your sitemap for breadth and come back here to dig into any page that looks off.
Queries run through the PeopleAreGeek lookup service. We log nothing.
What this technical SEO audit is for
It's for the quick gut-check right after you publish or change something. It won't replace Search Console, and it's not a full crawl or a content review either. What it does is a first pass: can the page actually be fetched, can a search engine find its way to it, does the metadata read like something a human wrote, and is anything obvious in the way. Maybe that sounds modest. Caught me out plenty of times anyway.
How to interpret the audit
- A high score just means nothing obvious is blocking the page. It does not promise you'll rank. Different thing entirely.
- Middling score? Usually there's cleanup to do before you bother asking Google to index it.
- A low one is pointing at something real, a crawl block or busted metadata. Fix that before anything else.
- And look, chase the action plan, not the number. The number's just a vibe.
Recommended workflow
Start with the hub page. Then work down to the individual tools, one by one. For each tool that matters, you want a few things true at once: it's linked from a hub, it shows up in the sitemap, it points its canonical at itself, it's actually indexable. Oh, and it has real explanatory text around it, not three lines of filler. That last bit gets forgotten more than you'd think.
Frequently asked questions
What does a technical SEO audit check?
The plumbing, basically. HTTP status. Whether the page is even indexable (robots.txt, meta robots, that sneaky X-Robots-Tag header). Canonical, HTTPS, redirects. Security headers. Is there a sitemap, is there a robots file. Any structured-data hints. None of it is glamorous. But this is the stuff that yanks a page out of search no matter how good the writing is, so.
How often should I run a technical SEO audit?
After any big change or a migration, for sure. And maybe once a quarter if the site is just sitting there stable. But honestly the moment that pays off most is right after you deploy. That is exactly when a stray noindex or a robots block sneaks in from staging, and you will not notice for weeks unless you look.
Is this a replacement for Screaming Frog or Search Console?
No. They sit next to each other. This thing is a fast one-URL check, that is its whole job. Screaming Frog crawls the entire site, which this does not. And Search Console is the ground truth, what Google actually does with your pages versus what you hope it does. You want all three, really.
Does it audit my whole site?
Nope, one URL at a time, but it goes deep on that one. Want the whole site? Point a crawler at your sitemap first. Then, when it flags a page that looks off, come back here and dig into that specific URL.
What is the most common technical SEO problem?
The noindex that came over from staging and never got pulled. Classic. Right behind it: a canonical pointing at the wrong preferred URL, which is sneakier because nothing looks broken. Both do the same quiet damage, they just take your pages out of search and do not tell you.